STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF CORN HYBRIDS ACROSS MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS AND YEARS

Keywords: Biplot GGE-SReg, Ward clusters, Reliability of the response, repeatability.

Abstract

Data of 34 trials established during the last three years (2017-2019), mainly in the Azuero Region in Panama, were used to evaluate some statistical tools for decision-making when releasing new genotypes, with the precision that these are superior to the controls in common use. The number of hybrids evaluated per year varied from 20, 15 and 18 genotypes, respectively. For this study, six hybrids in common were taken over the years, comparing them with the most used control in the country (30F-35). The original experimental design was Alpha Lattice with three repetitions, which varied over years. An analysis of variance was carried out individually and in a combined type REML in a Complete Random Block design for the analysis of the seven selected genotypes. These analyzes showed highly significant differences between the different hybrids evaluated for grain yield variable and other agronomic characteristics. This analysis showed that by reducing the number of cultivars, the variance between genotypes was reduced; while the variance between environments was increased. Within the evaluated hybrids, three exceeded the combined overall average, with P-4039, ADV-9789, and ADV-9779 standing out significantly, with averages exceeding 8,30 ton.ha-1. The Biplot GGE-SReg analysis identified ADV-9779 as the most stable hybrid across localities. The analysis of the reliability of the normalized response indicated that P-4039 exceeds the control in 87% of the locations. The used methodologies were confirmed to be useful and simple to identify superior genotypes for release in the evaluated areas of influence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Camargo-Buitrago, I., Gordón-Mendoza, R., y Quirós-McIntire, E.I. (2017). La repetitividad como estimador de la precisión experimental en el análisis de experimentos. Revista Agronomía Mesoamericana, 28(1), 159-169.

Camargo, I., Quirós, E.I., y Camargo, V.M. (2014). Selección de nuevos genotipos de arroz basados en la probabilidad de superar al testigo. Agron. Mesoamericana, 25(1), 63-71.

Camargo, I., Gordón, R., y Fuentes, M.R. (2003). Estabilidad y confiabilidad de los nuevos híbridos de maíz en comparación al testigo regional HB-83, 1998-200. Agron. Mesoamericana, 14(2), 129-134.

Córdova, H.S., Barreto, H.J., y Crossa, J. (1993). Impacto del desarrollo de híbridos en Centro América: confiabilidad de las ganancias en rendimiento sobre el genotipo H5 y consideraciones para selección de testigos regionales. En: Síntesis de resultados Experimentales del PRM. 4, 3-10.

Cornelius, P.L., Crossa, J., y Seyedsadr, M.S. (1996). Statistical test and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. En: Kang, M.S. y Gauch, H.G. (eds). Genotype-by-environment interaction. Boca Ratón, FL., CRC Press. 199-234.

Crossa, J., Gauch Junior, H.G., y Zobel, R.W. (1990). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science, 30, 493‑500.

Eskridge, K.M. (1997). Evaluation of corn hybrids using the probability of outperforming a check based on strip-test data. Journal of agricultural, biological and environmental statistics, 2(3), 245-254.

Eskridge, K.M., Smith, O.S., y Byrne, P.F. (1993). Comparing test cultivars using reliability functions of test check differences from on farm trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87, 60-64.

Eskridge, K.M, y Mumm, R.F. (1992). Choosing plant cultivars based on the probability of outperforming a check. Theor Appl. Genet. 84, 494-500.

Falconer, D.S. (1990). Introducción a la genética cuantitativa. 3ª imp. Compañía Editorial Continental S.A., MEX.

Gauch Junior, H.G., y Zobel, R.W. (1989). Accuracy and selection success in yield trial analyses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 77, 473‑481.

Gordón M, R., Franco, J.E., Núñez, J.I., Sáez, A.E., Jaén., J.E., Ramos, F.P., y Ávila, A.E. (2019). Evaluación de la adaptabilidad de híbridos de maíz a las condiciones agroclimáticas de la Región de Azuero, Panamá, 2017. Visión Antataura, 3(2), 15-32.

Gordón M, R., Franco, J.E., Núñez, J.I., Sáez, A.E., Ramos, F.P., Jaén, J.E., y San Vicente, F.M. (2020). Evaluación y selección de variedades de maíz para sistemas de agricultura familiar en Panamá, 2017-2019. Ciencia Agropecuaria, 31, 99-126.

Gordón M, R. (2020). Variabilidad climática en la Región de Azuero y su efecto sobre el cultivo de maíz. IDIAP.

Gordón M, R., Franco, J.E., Núñez, J.I., Sáez, A.E., y Jaén, J.E. (2017a). Adaptabilidad de 20 híbridos de maíz a las condiciones agroclimáticas de la zona maicera de la Región de Azuero, Panamá, 2016. Visión Antataura, 1(2), 1-17.

Gordón M, R., Franco, J., Núñez, J., Jaén, J., Sáez, A., Ramos, F., y Ávila, A. (2017b). Variedades de maíz en la Región de Azuero, Panamá, 2017. Ciencia Agropecuaria, 28, 117-131.

Gordón M, R., y Camargo B, I. (2015). Selección de estadísticos para la estimación de la precisión experimental en ensayos de maíz. Revista Agronomía Mesoamericana, 26(1), 55:63.

Gordón M, R. (2009). Manejo Integral del cultivo de Maíz. Folleto Técnico. IDIAP. 20 p.

Gordón, R., Camargo, I., Franco, J., y González, A. (2004). Impacto de la Precipitación Pluvial en el Rendimiento de Grano del Maíz en la Región de Azuero, Panamá, 1995-2003. I. Análisis de la Distribución de Lluvias y su Relación con la Época de Siembra. Ciencia Agropecuaria, 16, 17-30.

Holland, J.B., Nyquist, W.E., y Cervantes-Martínez, C.T. (2003). Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding and update. Plant Breed. Rev. 22, 9-11.

Johnson, D.E. (2000). Métodos multivariados aplicados al análisis de datos. International Thompson Editors. 566 p.

Nuland, D.S., y Eskridge, K.M. (1992). Probability of outperforming a check. In: H.F. Schwartz (ed.). Proceedings, 35th Bean Improvement Cooperative Meetings. Colorado State Univ. For. Collins. CO. p. 17-20. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84, 494-500.

Samonte, S.O.PB., Wilson, L.T., McClung, A.M., y Mendley, J.C. (2005). Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot analyses. Crop. Sci. 45, 2414-24124.

Vargas, M., Combs, E., Alvarado, G., Atlin, G., Mathews, K., y Crossa, J. (2013). META: A suite of SAS Programs to analyze Multi environment breeding trials. Agron. J. 105, 11-19.

Yan, W. (2014). Crop variety trials. Data management and analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., MA, USA.

Yan, W., y Holland, J.B. (2010). A heritability-adjusted GGE Biplot for test environmental evaluation. Euphytica 171, 355-369.

Yan, W, Kang, M.S., S. Woods, B. Ma, y Cornelius, P.L. (2007). GGE Biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47, 641-653.

Yan, W., y Kang, M.S. (2003). GGE Biplot Analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, FL. 271 p. https://books.google.com.pa/booksid=Bz2SpUxgnkC&lpg=PP1&ots=neKRaEtiBv&lr&pg=PA8#v=onepage&q&f=false

Yan, W., y Hunt, L.A. (2002). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. En: M.S. Kang, editor, Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB International, Wallingford. p. 289-319.

Yan, W., Cornelius, P., Crossa, J., y Hunt, L.A. (2001). Two types of GGE Biplots for analyzing multi environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41, 656-663.

Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., y Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar Evaluation and Mega Environment Investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop Sci. 40, 597-605.

Zobel, R.W., Madison, J.W., y Gauch, H.G. Jr. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80, 388-393.

Published
2021-06-01
How to Cite
Gordón-Mendoza, R., & Camargo-Buitrago, I. (2021). STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF CORN HYBRIDS ACROSS MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS AND YEARS. Ciencia Agropecuaria, (32), 12-37. Retrieved from http://www.revistacienciaagropecuaria.ac.pa/index.php/ciencia-agropecuaria/article/view/417
Section
Artículos